Google MCP vs AWS for Blockchain RPC Infrastructure

As blockchain applications continue to scale globally, the demand for robust, reliable, and low-latency Remote Procedure Call (RPC) infrastructure has never been higher. Selecting the right cloud provider for blockchain RPC infrastructure is critical for developers and enterprises aiming to optimize performance, reduce downtime, and manage costs effectively. Two leading contenders in this space are Google’s Multi-Cloud Proxy (MCP) and Amazon Web Services (AWS). This article explores the differences, advantages, and practical implications of using Google MCP versus AWS for blockchain RPC infrastructure.

Understanding Blockchain RPC Infrastructure

RPCs serve as the backbone of blockchain applications, enabling communication between decentralized networks and client applications. They translate requests from Web3 apps into blockchain queries and return the results, facilitating functions such as transaction submissions, data retrieval, and smart contract interactions.

Given the critical role RPCs play, infrastructure reliability and latency directly influence user experience and application uptime. Downtime or slow RPC responses can lead to transaction failures, degraded app performance, and ultimately loss of user trust and revenue. Therefore, the choice of cloud infrastructure provider for hosting and routing RPC traffic is a strategic decision.

Key RPC Infrastructure Requirements for Blockchain

• Reliability: Continuous availability with minimal downtime.
• Low Latency: Fast response times to support real-time blockchain interactions.
• Scalability: Ability to handle millions of API calls as usage grows.
• Cost Efficiency: Optimized infrastructure costs to maintain profitability.
• Multi-Region Support: Geographically distributed endpoints to reduce latency and provide redundancy.

Both Google MCP and AWS offer solutions that address these requirements, but their approaches and features differ significantly.

What is Google MCP and Why It Matters for Blockchain?

Google’s Multi-Cloud Proxy (MCP) is an advanced infrastructure layer designed to orchestrate API traffic across multiple cloud providers seamlessly. In the context of blockchain, MCP enables multi-cloud RPC routing, which means blockchain applications can leverage RPC endpoints distributed across different cloud environments, including Google Cloud, AWS, Azure, and others.

This multi-cloud approach is a game changer for Web3 developers seeking to enhance reliability and reduce latency. By automatically routing RPC calls to the fastest and most available endpoints, MCP mitigates the risk of single-provider outages and performance bottlenecks.

Benefits of Google MCP for Blockchain RPC

• Multi-Cloud Redundancy: MCP ensures RPC calls are routed to healthy endpoints across clouds, dramatically reducing downtime.
• Latency Optimization: By dynamically selecting the closest or fastest RPC provider, MCP lowers response times for end users globally.
• API Orchestration: MCP can aggregate and orchestrate multiple RPC providers into a unified endpoint, simplifying integration for developers.
• Scalability: Supports scaling blockchain APIs to millions of calls without breaking budgets.

These features align perfectly with the needs of modern blockchain applications, which require both high availability and cost-effective scaling.

AWS for Blockchain RPC Infrastructure

Amazon Web Services (AWS) remains the dominant cloud provider with an extensive global footprint and a comprehensive suite of tools for blockchain developers. AWS offers managed blockchain services alongside powerful compute, networking, and database solutions that can be leveraged to build RPC infrastructure.

Many blockchain projects rely on AWS for its mature ecosystem, global regions, and robust security features. AWS’s Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and API Gateway services can be configured to distribute RPC traffic and provide failover capabilities.

Strengths of AWS in Blockchain RPC Hosting

• Global Reach: AWS operates in over 30 geographic regions, enabling low-latency access worldwide.
• Integrated Services: Deep integration with AWS Lambda, EC2, and managed databases allows for flexible RPC endpoint deployment.
• Security and Compliance: AWS’s compliance certifications and security features help protect blockchain infrastructure.
• Load Balancing and Failover: ELB and Route 53 DNS services support traffic distribution and automatic failover.

Despite these advantages, AWS’s RPC hosting typically involves single-cloud reliance unless developers build complex multi-cloud architectures themselves, which can increase operational overhead.

Comparing Google MCP and AWS for Blockchain RPC

1. Multi-Cloud vs Single-Cloud Architecture

Google MCP’s defining feature is its multi-cloud proxy capability. This allows blockchain applications to route RPC calls dynamically across multiple cloud providers, enhancing redundancy and reducing the risk of outages caused by a single provider failure.

AWS, while offering excellent single-cloud reliability, does not natively provide multi-cloud RPC routing. Developers aiming for multi-cloud redundancy on AWS must architect custom solutions, which can be complex and costly.

2. Reliability and Downtime Mitigation

RPC downtime can be costly for blockchain projects, leading to failed transactions and poor user experience. MCP’s automatic failover across multiple providers ensures near-continuous availability, even if one cloud experiences an outage.

AWS provides robust failover within its own ecosystem but lacks built-in cross-cloud failover, making it more vulnerable to region or service-specific outages.

3. Latency and Performance

Google MCP’s multi-region and multi-cloud routing capabilities allow it to select the lowest-latency RPC endpoint dynamically. This is particularly beneficial for global blockchain applications where users are distributed worldwide.

AWS’s extensive global infrastructure also offers low latency, but without multi-cloud routing, it may not always provide the fastest path if a single region or availability zone is congested.

4. Cost Considerations

Cost efficiency is a major concern for blockchain developers. Google MCP’s ability to route traffic intelligently across providers can optimize costs by leveraging cheaper or more efficient RPC endpoints in real time.

AWS pricing is competitive but can become expensive at scale, especially when high availability and redundancy require deploying resources across multiple regions.

5. Developer Experience and Integration

Google MCP simplifies integration by aggregating multiple RPC providers into a single endpoint, reducing complexity for developers. It also supports API orchestration, enabling advanced routing and traffic management.

AWS offers a rich set of developer tools and managed services but requires more manual configuration to achieve similar multi-provider orchestration and routing capabilities.

Which is the Better Choice for Blockchain RPC Infrastructure?

The answer depends on the specific needs and priorities of the blockchain project.

Choose Google MCP if:

• You require multi-cloud redundancy to minimize downtime risk.
• You want to optimize latency globally with dynamic routing.
• You prefer simplified API orchestration with a unified RPC endpoint.
• You are focused on cost optimization through intelligent traffic routing.

Choose AWS if:

• You prefer a mature, single-cloud ecosystem with extensive global regions.
• You want deep integration with AWS’s blockchain and compute services.
• You prioritize security and compliance features native to AWS.
• You have the resources to build custom multi-cloud failover solutions if needed.

The Future of Blockchain RPC Infrastructure: Embracing Multi-Cloud

The blockchain ecosystem is evolving rapidly, and the infrastructure supporting it must keep pace. Traditional single-cloud RPC hosting is increasingly seen as a risk due to potential outages and latency issues. Multi-cloud solutions like Google MCP represent the future of Web3 infrastructure by providing unparalleled reliability, scalability, and cost efficiency.

As more blockchain projects scale to millions of API calls and require global reach, multi-cloud RPC routing will become the new standard. Developers and enterprises that adopt these advanced architectures early will benefit from improved uptime, faster response times, and better cost control.

Conclusion

Both Google MCP and AWS offer compelling options for blockchain RPC infrastructure, but their strengths lie in different areas. Google MCP’s multi-cloud proxy technology provides superior redundancy, latency optimization, and cost savings through intelligent routing across multiple providers. AWS offers a robust, secure, and globally distributed single-cloud platform with deep integration capabilities.

For blockchain projects prioritizing maximum reliability and performance with minimal downtime, Google MCP’s multi-cloud approach is a powerful solution. However, for teams deeply embedded in the AWS ecosystem or requiring specific AWS services, AWS remains a strong choice.

Ultimately, understanding the trade-offs and aligning infrastructure choices with project goals will empower blockchain developers to build resilient, scalable, and cost-effective RPC infrastructures that meet the demands of the next generation of decentralized applications.

As you consider the insights on Google MCP and AWS for your blockchain RPC infrastructure, remember that there's a solution designed to streamline your Web3 development. Uniblock, a Web3 infrastructure orchestration platform, offers a single API endpoint that intelligently auto-routes traffic across multiple providers. With Uniblock, you can achieve maximum uptime, minimize latency, and optimize infrastructure costs without the complexity of managing decentralized networks. Join over 2,000 developers on 100+ chains who trust Uniblock to power their dApps, tooling, and analytics. Start building with Uniblock today and experience the ease of Web3 infrastructure orchestration.